pdf (449 pages / 3MB), with thanks to the original sharer
The lawyer's comment was that if the McTell monies were substantial - "large enough to attract attention if word gets out - which it would if they had to pay them over to the state," and, if Peer hadn't paid anyone on the account for decades - "Probably since McTell's death in 1959 and maybe even before that," - then "this combination could be a professional black eye to Peer; indicating they couldn't be bothered finding someone they owed lots of money to. That's not the kind of attention to detail that potential co-publishers are looking for. Add in the obvious racial overtones and the cultural importance of McTell's work, and you have a nasty publicity problem for Peer."



